SEATTLE, April 12, 2016 /PRNewswire/ — U.S. metros that historically have offered the best chance of success for children from low-income families have become among the least affordable cities in the country, according to a new Zillow analysis of mortgage and rental affordabilityi. This relatively new phenomenon limits opportunities for low-income people who cannot afford to live in places that offer the most potential to climb the socioeconomic ladder.
Nationally, homebuyers could expect to spend about 15 percent of their income on a monthly mortgage payment at the end of 2015, while renters could expect to pay just under 30 percent of their income on monthly rent payments.
Across the country, low-income people have been most affected by unaffordability. Wages are growing slower than home values, and tight inventory at the bottom end of the housing market has driven up values, pricing many of them out of homeownership. Zillow’s new affordability report highlights how unaffordability may be impacting the ability of children from low-income families to improve their socio-economic status when they become adults.
People Are Paying More Than 40 percent of Their Income on Rent in Major Job Markets
The percent of income renters could expect to pay for a monthly rental payment has increased since 2000, when renters spent 25 percent of their income on rent. After the housing downturn, builders stopped building many new homes, restricting the number of available rentals and driving up prices, especially because an increasing number of renters drove up demand.
In two thirds of metros, renters could expect to put more of their income towards rent than the historical averageii. In major job markets like the Bay Area, New York, and Los Angeles, the median rent requires more than 40 percent of the median income. Renters in Los Angeles can expect to spend nearly half of their income on rent.
Home Buying is Relatively Affordable, but Low-Income People Cannot Take Advantage
Conversely, persistently low mortgage rates are keeping the share of the income homebuyers can expect to spend on their monthly mortgage payments lower than the historical norm, even as home values continue to recover.
However, low-income people may not be able to take advantage of relatively affordable mortgage payments, due to high rents making it difficult to save for a down payment and few available homes within their price range.
The Gap in Home Values Between Places with the Best and Worst Opportunities for Upward Social Mobility Has Nearly Tripled Over Past 20 Years
Researchers from Harvard University’s Equality of Opportunity Projectiii found that children from low-income families in the Bay Area, Los Angeles, Seattle, Denver, New York, and Boston were among the most likely to join the middle class as adults. Zillow data shows that these are some of the least affordable places for both renters and buyers.
Home values have increased most in the very same metro areas that offer a path to a prosperous future – and incomes have not kept up. In the late 1990s, the average home value in the places with the best opportunities for upward socio-economic mobility was about 56 percent higher than home values in the places where getting ahead is most difficult. Today, that gap has nearly tripled to 147 percent.
“This research shows that it’s harder than ever for kids who grew up in the country’s lowest income households to live in the places where they’re most likely to succeed,” said Zillow Chief Economist Dr. Svenja Gudell. “Getting ahead and improving your socio-economic status is at the very heart of the American Dream. We already knew that high rents and growing housing costs were hitting low-income people hardest, and it’s clear the housing affordability crisis on the coasts is a barrier to their upward social mobility.”
Below are the most and least affordable metrosiv for homebuyers and renters, based on the share of income they can expect to pay on a monthly mortgage payment or rent.
|
Most Affordable Metros |
|||
|
For homebuyers |
For renters |
||
|
1. |
Detroit, Mich. – 10.2% |
1. |
St. Louis, Mo. – 23.4% |
|
2. |
Pittsburgh, Penn. – 10.6% |
2. |
Pittsburgh, Penn. – 24.2% |
|
3. |
Indianapolis, Ind. & Cleveland, Ohio – 11.0% |
3. |
Kansas City, Mo. – 24.5% |
|
4. |
St. Louis, Mo. – 11.2% |
4. |
Minneapolis, Minn. – 24.6% |
|
5. |
Cincinnati, Ohio – 11.3% |
5. |
Detroit, Mich. – 24.9% |
|
Least Affordable Metros |
|||
|
For homebuyers |
For renters |
||
|
1. |
San Jose, Calif. – 42.6% |
1. |
Los Angeles, Calif. – 47.6% |
|
2. |
San Francisco, Calif. – 41.3% |
2. |
San Francisco, Calif. – 46.1% |
|
3. |
Los Angeles, Calif. – 40.4% |
3. |
Miami, Fla. – 43.8% |
|
4. |
San Diego, Calif. – 33.0% |
4. |
New York/Northern New Jersey – 41.4% |
|
5. |
New York/Northern New Jersey – 25.2% |
5. |
San Jose, Calif. – 41.2% |
Zillow
Zillow® is the leading real estate and rental marketplace dedicated to empowering consumers with data, inspiration and knowledge around the place they call home, and connecting them with the best local professionals who can help. In addition, Zillow operates an industry-leading economics and analytics bureau led by Zillow’s Chief Economist Dr. Svenja Gudell. Dr. Gudell and her team of economists and data analysts produce extensive housing data and research covering more than 450 markets at Zillow Real Estate Research. Zillow also sponsors the quarterly Zillow Home Price Expectations Survey, which asks more than 100 leading economists, real estate experts and investment and market strategists to predict the path of the Zillow Home Value Index over the next five years. Zillow also sponsors the bi-annual Zillow Housing Confidence Index (ZHCI) which measures consumer confidence in local housing markets, both currently and over time. Launched in 2006, Zillow is owned and operated by Zillow Group (NASDAQ:Z and ZG), and headquartered in Seattle.
Zillow is a registered trademark of Zillow, Inc.
i Zillow determined affordability by analyzing the current percentage of a metro area’s median income needed to afford the rent or the monthly mortgage payment on a median-priced home or apartment, and compared it to the share of income needed in the pre-bubble years between 1985 and 1999. For mortgage affordability, Zillow assumed a 20 percent down payment and a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage at prevailing mortgage rates pulled from the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey. If the share of monthly income currently needed to afford the median-priced home or apartment is greater than it was during the pre-bubble years, that area is considered unaffordable for typical buyers or renters.
ii The share of income needed in pre-bubble years from 1985-1999.
iiihttp://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/index.php/data
iv Based on the 35 largest metros in the U.S.
Photo – http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20160411/354051-INFO
SOURCE Zillow